Attorney General Jay Jones addresses misleading mailers sent to Black voters in Virginia

Jason Miyares, Attorney General of Virginia
Jason Miyares, Attorney General of Virginia
0Comments

Attorney General Jay Jones said on Mar. 9 that deceptive mailers targeting Black voters about Virginia’s redistricting referendum are misusing civil rights imagery and spreading false information.

The issue is important because it concerns the integrity of voter information and the respectful treatment of historical struggles for civil rights. The Attorney General’s office supports civil rights enforcement and victim assistance programs, according to the official website.

Jones said, “As Virginia’s first Black Attorney General, I take very seriously the history that is being invoked in these mailers. Reports indicate that a group opposing the redistricting referendum has sent materials to Black voters that misuse imagery from the Civil Rights Movement and even invoke Jim Crow while falsely suggesting the measure threatens Black representation.”

He continued, “My parents and grandparents lived through the reality of Jim Crow in Virginia. They experienced firsthand what it meant when the law and the political system were used to silence Black voices. That history is not a political prop, and it should never be exploited in a misleading attempt to confuse voters.”

The Attorney General of Virginia provides legal counsel and representation to state agencies while promoting public safety and defending constitutional rights, as detailed on the official website. The office also serves all residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia, addresses issues such as human trafficking and domestic violence through legal advocacy, and offers consumer protection resources for identity theft and fraud reporting, according to information available on its official site.

Jones concluded by saying, “Virginians deserve honest information about the choices before them. Invoking the pain and sacrifice of the civil rights movement while spreading misleading claims about this referendum disrespects the very people who fought to secure the right to vote and have their voices heard.”

The broader implications involve maintaining trust in election processes by ensuring accurate communication with voters. Observers may look for further actions from state officials or advocacy groups regarding election-related communications.



Related

Virginia Court of Appeals Judges

Former nurse alleges hospital employment caused PTSD and depression, court affirms compensation

A Virginia appellate court has upheld a decision awarding compensation to a former nurse who developed PTSD and major depressive disorder while working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Virginia Court of Appeals Courthouse

Former student Sean Lohr accuses Virginia Tech board and official of First Amendment violations

A former Virginia Tech student, Sean Lohr, brought a lawsuit against the university’s Board of Visitors and an assistant director for student conduct, alleging violations of his First Amendment rights.

Virginia Court of Appeals Courthouse

Health insurance customer challenges arbitration clause in dispute with plan administrator and associations

A Virginia appeals court has reversed a lower court’s decision regarding whether a health insurance customer must arbitrate her claims against several organizations involved in selling her insurance.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Virginia Courts Daily.